French President Emmanuel Macron’s recent comments urging countries to halt arms supplies to Israel have provoked a strong reaction from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, as reported by the New York Times. Macron’s assertion, made during discussions about the ongoing conflict in Gaza and Lebanon, suggests that an arms embargo could facilitate a ceasefire, a stance Netanyahu has vehemently opposed.
In a video statement, Netanyahu responded to Macron’s remarks, emphasizing that Israel is engaged in a fight against “barbarism led by Iran” and asserting that all civilized nations should stand firmly with Israel. He expressed indignation at Macron’s call for an arms embargo, labeling it shameful and insisting that Israel would prevail regardless of external support.
This is not the first time Macron has advocated for limiting arms supplies to Israel. He previously presented a similar argument at the United Nations General Assembly, highlighting the inconsistency of demanding a ceasefire while continuing to supply weapons. Analysts note that Macron’s approach aims to strike a delicate balance: while he supports Israel’s right to self-defense, he also critiques its military actions and calls for a ceasefire to mitigate civilian casualties in conflict zones.
Experts suggest that Macron’s timing, coinciding with the upcoming anniversary of Hamas’s attack on Israel, could further complicate France’s diplomatic relations with Israel. Despite France not being a significant arms supplier to Israel—where over 90% of arms come from the United States and Germany—Macron’s comments may reflect broader frustrations with US policies in the region.
The ongoing violence has escalated, with Israel intensifying its military offensive in Gaza, leading to substantial casualties and humanitarian crises among the Palestinian population. Meanwhile, Hamas has retaliated, striking Israeli cities, which has heightened tensions across the region. As the conflict continues, Macron’s attempt to mediate may lead to alienation from both sides, underscoring the complexities of Middle Eastern diplomacy.
