The editor of National Newsletter wrote on his Facebook page today on the Israelis’ demands for Benjamin Netanyahu, the country’s prime minister, to step down. I feel obligated, as a humanitarian, to offer a quick commentary on certain people’s points of view about this news item. Hardline Zionists have stated that Benjamin Netanyahu is an excellent leader of Israel and that he should continue leading the country to fulfil the ethnically sacred purpose of the Gaza Strip’s civilian population. They contend that God has entrusted him with the holy task of eradicating all Muslims from Palestine.
On the other hand, some moderate Jews in Israel are calling for Benjamin Netanyahu to resign in protest of his cruel policies, the end of the war, the peaceful release of their hostages, and an immediate halt to the genocide of Gaza’s civilian population. However, Muslims have denounced Benjamin Netanyahu’s heinous and cruel crime of demolishing Gaza and murdering innocent Palestinians, and they have criticised his fascist tactics. They refer to him as the Hitler of this age and a war criminal. They insist that he be held accountable for war crimes. He has perpetually benefited politically from the racial and religious emotions of the Israelites.
To grind the axe, he is inciting hate towards the Palestinians and using blackmail to coerce the Jews. While some Christians have also backed him, the bulk of Christians have vehemently denounced and cursed him for his cruel deeds and the slaughter in Gaza, and many have called for his resignation and the death penalty. During a recent speech in parliament, an Irish lawmaker vehemently denounced Benjamin Netanyahu’s Nazi practices. He detested the massacre of Gaza’s innocent population. He declared three times in his ludicrous speech that Benjamin Netanyahu “will straight go to Hell for his atrocious deeds.”
Having read the opinions of Muslims, Christians, and Jews, I thought it was my moral and ethical obligation to address this matter in order to further the common good and find a peaceful resolution to the conflict. My endeavour to resist hate speech and publications is only motivated by a true desire for peace and the best interests of Muslims and Jews. Since they are people, we must treat them like people.
Without any prejudice, I suggest that Israel must implement UN Resolution of Two State Formula and honor OSLO pact. The International Court of Justice has also asked Benjamin Netanyahu to immediately end war in Gaza and stop the genocide of the Palestinians. This man has put UN Resolution, OSLO Pact and the judgement of International Court into dust bin and is indiscriminately shedding the blood of the civilians of Gaza. A great poet of the sub- continent Mirza Ghalib had said that some persons do not turn into dust after death, rather they sprout like red tulips and roses. Indirectly, he was insinuating that the martyrs do not die and their blood leaves impeccable impact and the future impetus of the sacrifices dazzles the eyes of history. The blood shed of the innocent civilians of Gaza will not go waste. Blood is not water, which is colorless and smell-less. Blood is blood. It has color and smell.
I applaud the Jewish people who are demonstrating against Israeli fascist Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s unspeakable crimes against the defenceless civilians in Gaza. Benjamin Netanyahu is accused of being a fascist and of endangering the lives of all Jews worldwide. He adheres to Zionism. He has committed murder. The day will come when the Palestinians will have the opportunity and authority to gather their forces and launch a full-scale military offensive. If that occurs, the idea of Jews being assaulted in the same way that Muslims are being attacked now would once again shock everyone who values peace and decency.
The carnage of any nation would never be appreciated or tolerated by a lover of mankind. A poet once said that even when wounds heal, they still leave scars. Wounds are recalled by the scars. Will the next generation of Palestinians ever forget what Benjamin Netanyahu’s fascist administration is doing to them? He is living in the wrong era. No nation can ever be destroyed. A Muslim man was recently shown in a video burying his three sons who were slain by an Israeli bombing. in Gaza. “When you meet the Holy Prophet, do complaint against the Muslims that they did not come to save us from the strangling grasp of the aggressors,” he says, gesturing to their lifeless bodies.
Is this not such a tragic scene? Are these individuals not human? The Zionists believe that via their expansionist plans, they would bring their dictatorship to every Muslim nation. Theodore Herzl’s “An Island named Zion: The Political Theory of Herzl” is the manifesto of greater Israel. The goal of Zionism is to subjugate every Muslim nation. They consider it to be a duty imposed by religion. They already have political and economic sway over the Western nations. Christ was crucified by them. Since the Muslims did not exist when Jesus lived, they did not crucify him. As a humanist, I fervently implore Israel’s more astute citizens to remove all political con artists and religious fanatics from the political sphere by democratic channels and encourage.
Better to put an end to this tug of war right away and look for a peaceful resolution and mutual understanding. Some nations’ leaders, who back Benjamin Netanyahu’s Nazi government, are narrow-minded and biassed. Third World War is being invited by them.
Benjamin Netanyahu needs to step down and Israel needs to follow international law if the world is to see peace. He has to be imprisoned, dealt with, and replaced with sensible and moderate Jews. It would be better for Israel to free itself from Zionist shackles and rely on moderate Jews. The parties’ safety is entwined with it.
According to several US senators, any writing or speech critical of Israel ought to be illegal as it constitutes hate speech. I find it astounding when responsible individuals make such claims. Who opposes Israel? Nobody. Not a single Muslim has ever declared that Israel should be destroyed. The UN decision on the two-state formula has been recognized by Muslims worldwide, including Palestinian Muslims.
However, they find it difficult to accept and a bitter pill to take. It has been known as “Palestine; not Israel” for millennia. The Palestinians aligned and accepted the state of Jewish immigration for the sake of peace. These senators do not recognize the sacrifices they have made because they have chosen to ignore the ongoing persecution of Gaza’s civilian population. It is imperative to preserve America’s reputation as a nation that embodies democracy, humanism, and fairness. Will these senators do more to damage America’s reputation? Rather of endorsing, endorsing, and encouraging the slaughter committed by Benjamin Netanyahu’s Nazi state, they ought to call for his resignation and back a moderate, humane, and democratic administration.
The freedoms of speech, writing, and expression are guaranteed by the US Constitution and the UN Charter. I believe that no one should write or talk negatively about any nation, religion, or country, and that we should all respect each other’s flags and nationalities. However, it is our collective right to oppose fascist governments and to stand up for democracy, peace, justice, and humanity. The following phrases are chanted by demonstrators as they peacefully gather throughout the world to oppose Benjamin Netanyahu’s fascist regime: “End War,” “Stop Genocide.” “Palestine Free.” Are these chants directed against Israel or Benjamin Netanyahu’s fascist regime? Are these catchphrases hostile to UN resolutions? Do these slogans oppose democracy, humanism, or human rights?
Then why are the cops attacking these nonviolent demonstrations and processions? Even in Israel, the fascist government drove away moderate and democratic Jews who demonstrated against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s cruel actions on public streets. Are these Israelis hostile to Israel, their own country? Not at all. I advise the senators from the United States who are considering passing legislation restricting or stifling individual liberty and rights to instead pass legislation to preserve humankind.
