Journalists risk harassment, intimidation, and digital repression during internet shutdowns.
Kashmir has emerged as one of the most dangerous places for journalists. The media in this conflict-ridden region suffers serious risks, including harassment, intimidation, and physical violence, forcing many journalists to rely on self-censorship for survival.
In recent years, the Modi government’s use of digital repression in Kashmir has been increasingly effective. Frequent internet outages have hampered communication and information flow.
Notably, following the abrogation of Article 370 in 2019, the region experienced its longest internet blackout, lasting seven consecutive months. These shutdowns, coupled with curfews and roadblocks, have created formidable barriers for journalists trying to report on the ground.
The elimination of Jammu and Kashmir’s statehood and autonomy has resulted in heightened limitations on press freedom. The Indian government’s anti-riot policies have hampered media’ ability to report correctly and quickly. While some internet services have been partially restored, access is still limited and closely watched.
In this climate of fear, the Indian government has been chastised for restricting critical news. Since August 5, 2019, journalists in Kashmir have faced stringent restrictions and regular threats. Last year, Amnesty International and other human rights organisations criticised the detention of freelance journalist Irfan Meraj in Indian-administered Kashmir, appealing for his immediate and unconditional release.
Local media say that covering the situation in Kashmir has grown increasingly difficult. International journalists also find it difficult to report freely owing to frequent internet disruptions and other barriers. Despite these significant limits, the Modi government asserts that the media in Jammu & Kashmir is free to operate without fear of intimidation or harassment.
